Sunday 20 February 2011

The price of snowdrops

Much has been made, in the relevant media, of the price recently paid for a bulb of the snowdrop 'E.A. Bowles'. The anonymous bidder paid £357 for a single bulb, news that made the front page of the Daily Telegraph. I can't remember the last time I saw a front page Telegraph headline reading 'Gucci handbag sold for £357 at auction' or 'frock by French fashionista fetches £357'. I'm fairly sure it wouldn't be news. Yet, when someone pays £357 for a plant that, in fifty years' time, when the handbags and frocks being bought today will be moth-eaten and forgotten, will still be giving pleasure to its owner, journos feel obliged to repeat with mind-numbing tediousness, the idea that the current enthusiasm in the UK for snowdrops is just like the tulip bubble of the Dutch 'Golden Age'. Why can't these well-paid, so-called professionals think before they hit the 'send to editor' button?

Things you can buy for £357.

Two hours and ten minutes with a top-flight psychiatrist (http://www.harleystreetguide.co.uk/doctors/psychiatrists/pardeep-grewal/)

A flight half way to Australia (http://book.qantas.com.au/pl/QFOnline/wds/OverrideServlet)

One handbag.(http://www.handbagleague.com/Hermes-Bags/Hermes-birkin/30Cm-Birkin-Pink-Ostrich-With-Gold-Hardware)

Nine hours with the cheapest prostitute in Amsterdam (http://www.ignatzmice.com/RLD_Walking_Tour). Don't ask me what customers do with the last eight hours and fifty five minute of their alloted time.

Four hundred pot noodles (http://www.potnoodle.com/pier/)



45 minutes with a good divorce lawyer (http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2007/jul/15/familyandrelationships)

The most interesting comment on this affair, in my opinion, was made by a journalist on John Grimshaw's blog (see here). After admitting gracefully to repeating innuendo, she said that 'my lot' (i.e. her editor) had enquired '£357? Is that a lot?' In other words, the metropolitan elite, who decide what we should think, haven't the slightest ability to measure value, once the object under consideration falls outside the miniscule cross-section of the interest spectrum they cater to.

4 comments:

  1. liked the one on the premiership footballer. You could have bought 0.006 grams of Fernando Torres for the same amount. Interesting but by the way he has started at Chelsea I think your snowdrop might have been a better investment for them as well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'll take the eight grams of cocaine, thanks very much. I don't know if you could snort Fernando Torres but I expect he'd stick in the straw unless you freeze dried him or something.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was not planning to snort Fernando Torres - I can think of few things worse than nasal-canabalism of footballers. I was just delighted how totally useless 6 thousands of gram of a footballer would be.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You and me both, brother. My point exactly. A snowdrop might seem expensive, until you start to think about what else you could buy for the same price and the pleasure you'd get from that purchase.

    ReplyDelete